by Azaroth | August 22nd, 2009
While we can go over the topics I have concern about repeatedly, all that’s being accomplished is addressing my concerns. I think it’s pretty fair that we address yours.
If you’ve got a question or a concern (or even a suggestion) no matter how off the wall, post it for a discussion. If it requires more attention than it can get in the comments section of this post, I’ll make a new post dealing with it direction.
At the moment I have two or three more planned discussions regarding IPY 2, and then we’ll move on to 3.0 discussion.
Loading ...
Well, like I said, any choice that gets made about this stuf probably isn’t going to deter me from playing at all, and I think most people who paly UO freeshards will play IPY regardless as well.
But, horses = off screening 1 v 1 field any time you’re about to die = lame = boring = no.
It gives dexxers a huge advantage in 1 v 1 field fights that they do not need because a well suited dexer will kill a mage 1 v 1 field most of the time.
Offscreening synchs can happen just fine without using horses. With horses you’d have to pay less attention to positioning because even if you were out of position you could probably still offscreen fast enough.
Proof that offscreening works fine without horses? View multiple complaints about -U- doing it.
Large amount of comments, smallamountofpeas.
Let’s move this discussion over to the new Synch Dump post, as nobody new to the conversation is going to be willing to sort through over 100 replies.
Umbral will support and play IPY 2.0 100% We couldn’t be more thrilled, and we have already began contacting all our old members who have since given up on the return of IPY.
Thank you Azaroth. We have played so many shit reincarnate clones of the best UO server that has ever existed, and we can’t fucking wait!
Don’t give out black items for 3rd place at Cript’s 3 A.M. tourneys
I could tell a funny story about that.
But I wouldn’t worry about that kind of thing too much. ;)